Those, who are familiar with this effect, may skip several paragraphs. For the rest it would be necessary to clear what this effect is. Compton discovered an effect that lately was named after him. The effect is in the following: when X-rays passed through thin metal plates, besides direct rays scattered ones were observed. The direct rays naturally subsided to some degree while the scattered rays had greater value of the wavelength. The increase of the wavelength was connected with scattering angle with the dependence 

    ^{( 1).}

The numerical factor in the equality   was named Compton wavelength. Quantum physics scientists set to explain this effect and they managed to do it “brilliantly”. First they introduced the quantum term “momentum”

     ^{( 2),}

Where one can easily find the modification of the formula   . Indeed, in the article “Spectra Secrets” we got


Let’s change period for frequency
v=E/h
And substitute it in the formula (2)

p=(h/c)*E/h=E/c=mc
 Why did we need this reincarnation? Everything of genius is simple: in the famous formula classical laws are observed while quantum physics denies any of them. Hoping that nobody would find the  tautology between the formulas   and , quantum physics scientists preferred to prance on the classical horseback secretly. Then they suggested decomposing the momentum in the parallelogram (pic. 1).

    We are offered the following dish: a photon collides with a free electron and as a result the photon is reflected at the angle and the electron is reflected at the  angle, and the electron portion scattered at the and the electron portion scattered at the angle are equal". It’s an explanation of genius from the impudence point of view, not from the physics one. Let ephemeral photons be reflected, but how could material electrons be reflected with the equal momentum (a momentum supposes existence of mass).
    Then they got the desired by simple manipulation of speeds

     ^{( 3).}

   How can one possibly evaluate such practice?
* The reincarnation trick deserves “Poor”. – It’s petty and dishonorable.
** The second “Poor” is given for the masquerade with momentum decomposition. If it were an honest decomposition of the product mc, we would just rebuke them – why do one need a scalar factor? The speeds parallelogram has been known in physics for a long time, it allows to solve the task of speed decomposition easily.
    ***Don’t be naïve. It’s not by chance. A quantum physics scientist isn’t to condescend to the famous classical formulas. Another “Poor” for unauthorized speed decomposition according to classical laws.
   ****One more “Poor” is inevitable, this time it is for the fact that a material electron is reflected from a non-material photon according to classical laws, but without any mass consideration. It’s a libel about the elastic collision theory.
    But all these marks would be given to an ordinary student while it’s impossible to grade authors of numerous textbooks who copy this nonsense. All the national academies of the world deserve these marks as they authorize this explanation of Compton scattering.

    Why did the authors of this research burst so vigorously to the desired ? Because they didn’t understand where everything is coming from. They just saw that Compton factor value could be resulted using the substitution of the electron parameters. Therefore, it is required to collide this massless photon with an electron. How they could possibly know that it was nothing more than the de Broglie wavelength [1], but why is it here?
    However, we have to thank them for free electrons, as they were forced to admit their presence in metals without atomic ionization. What is going on indeed?
    One can read about the effect itself on the real physics website [2], but we need to make some excursion into atomic physics for its description.
Radiation and Light.
    It was implicitly admitted long time ago that space was penetrated by free electrons [3,4], we have just corroborated it by the designed experiments. And it’s characteristic equally for both liquids and even solids. We have mentioned above that this fact is silently proved for metals. Actually we can observe light and use airwaves only due to electronic structure of the space. Still it’s necessary to recollect in broad strokes the interaction of free electrons to feel the essence of light.  Let’s represent their structure as cubic cells of side z. The given space can be characterized by volume charge density

     ^{( 4).}

        The generally accepted system of representations through the “charge” parameter is wrong. It was found out in atomic research, and it’s acceptable for free electrons. It’s possible to use “charge”, but it’s much better to set forth the ideas correctly from the very beginning. The space is characterized by the level of average energy that consists of atom and ambient molecules energy as well as free electrons. Atoms and molecules are independent inhabitants in the given space while electrons from a retransmission net for any type of energy change. Molecule energy in gas environment is incomparably lesser than electron energy, so we leave it out.
   Instead of volume charge density we use volume energy density that represents the scalar parameter – pressure. 

^{(Pa)      ( 5).}

   Any energy change in this cube causes force change  on the border with the nearby cell. We found out that the distance is m in the air environment. Therefore, the interaction force of rest free electrons equals N.
        It determines the degree of structure condensity, i. e. inelasticity. It’s a rather strong force. At any rate, the explanation principal of the speed parallelogram (pic. 1) seems to be quackery. Radiation and light are unable to change the position of free electrons. But if the structure is heated one-sidedly, it will be distorted, i.e. the z-parameter will grow beside the heater equalizing the pressure on the cells borders http://realphis.narod.ru/svet.html#effect.  At the same time the energy density dynamically remains irregular, because the cells near the heater are to do condensity work. .
    It’s enough to stop heating to see the structure gradually recover its initial parameters. A vivid example of this mechanism is the so-called red glow of the atmosphere that is condensed in the daytime and recovers in the form of weak flashes at night.
    So we define light as a phenomenon of losing energy, or more exactly, of its transferring from a cell containing more energy to a cell with a lower level of it. Any steady conditions of glow indicate the stability of median energy density.  It means that all types of radiation are characterized by phases of energy absorption of surrounding electrons.
    Thus, any radiation of a local energy source is creation of a pressure wave which is transferred in turn by the cells of free electron structure. The sizes of the material sources are enormously larger in comparison with the z-parameter, so it’s right to use the straight-line wave-front term. Even considering that this straightness is very relative, it doesn’t matter, because the interactions of neighboring electrons with this wave are not cophased. It’s here where the essence of Compton scattering is hidden. Every retransmitter is independent so a pressure wave-front goes through a scattering attempt on each tiny z interval. These attempts are stopped by integral pressure of the neighboring cells. When an obstruction appears in the wave way, the pressure integral on its left and right isn’t balanced and a ray deflects.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
1. Rudnev A. D. Volna de-Broglie [Broglie wave]. http://realphis.narod.ru/ponemnogu.html#beta
2. Rudnev A.D. Compton bez effekta [Compton without scattering]. http://realphis.narod.ru/svet.html#effect.
3. Wood R. Physical Optics., L-M., ONTI, 1936.
4. Huygens-Fresnel principle.  htth://www.cultinfo.ru/fulltext/