About Collider and Darkness
A. D. Rudnev
   A great number of publications with scaring titles about the forthcoming doomsday made our readers ask us to comment on it. We postponed the coverage of burning physical problems though this topic wasn’t among the planned ones. It must be mentioned that such a change makes the explanation difficult, because we have to talk about the essence of the problem and clarify the delusions at the same time. Let’s try...
   
What is the collider for?
    Before working a detail a metalworker should vise it. And what should one do if it is impossible to hold a particle? One has to set one particle on other one in various conditions and hunt out the truth about the microworld judging by the difference of collision results. And what if every such a try costs enormous amount of money? – One has to reduce their unquenchable curiosity and the number of experiments. That is why human knowledge about the microworld is mostly hypothetical. A lot of questions have no accurate answers so knowledge is substituted for exotic hypotheses. But sooner or later it is necessary to conduct a decisive experiment which would prove all the hypotheses or reject them. We tend to think that the second will happen, because a lot of present knowledge has been proved inaccurate.
    Now let’s talk about horror stories. There is nothing to be afraid of, something will happen, something like an unexpected sneeze – just a sneeze, somebody gives a start and that is all. The horror stories are based on a fairy-like hypothesis about black holes and dark matter. All this is nonsense, there is no dark matter and dark energy, there is only common lack of understanding of particle properties. Darkness exits only in human minds. Until one explains why protons gravitate and electrons repel (though their energies are positive), it is impossible to explain both interaction of particles and gravitation. But we have agreed above that it is necessary. 

   On the left you can see the diagram of energy field of a “normal” particle, it is a hyperbole E(r)r = Const. Energy field is characterized by force potency F(r) and has a negative gradient. Imagine, that there is some anchor at the r1  point that ties firmly our diagram to the X- axis (Picture on the right). Now the energy field is divided into 3 intervals, and the gradient changes sign in the middle interval.

It is easy to understand that energy volume E(r) determines pressure P. As we have already examined falsity of the photon theory, we know that light is a pressure wave. It means that an energy well can be a really impassable barrier for light. Energy of pressure wave will disappear in an energy well, but there is no dark matter or a dark hole.
    Effects of proton short-range interactions are explained with the help of an energy anchor, these effects have commonplace names “strong and electroweak interactions”. Such an anchor is formed by structure of particles which is ignored by science. An atomic sphere is formed by placement of electrons in the newly formed well, and energy of atomic electrons is absorbed mostly by the well. A very small part of their initial value is left (several electron-volt). This very disappearing energy is binding energy of electrons with the nucleus. It is possible to get different effects acting on such an atom: Воздействуя на такой атом, можно получить разные эффекты: static compression can reduce atom radius while dynamic one can destroy it. Destruction releases binding energy, and heat is emitted.
    What is more interesting is to destroy a nucleus, but it requires enormous amount of energy. This energy can be obtained only by particle acceleration. Naturally, one should accelerate two groups of particles coming from the opposite directions. That is why we need a collider.
What is to expect?

   There will be no black holes, no explosions, except for splash energy and following glow. There will be no quarks, no Higgs bosons- all this is conservatives’ fictions.
   Nature created the physical world non-selectively, likely by an explosion. It is natural to suppose that the sizes of energy “balls” were various. But only those could survive that meet the two conditions:  
1. Space must be rich with heavy particles (for matter creation) and light particles situated between heavy ones (for interaction energy transfer);
2. Heavy particles mass must be  ~1838 times more that light particles mass;
    Light particles (electrons) already form space structure. They transfer a pressure wave (light) and radio waves. Under conditions of this structure particle collisions in the collider will lead to bursts of beta emissions (fast electrons) and gamma radiation of wide spectrum. Visible spectrum range is light flashes. Finally, nuclear fission that creates alpha rays, neutron radiation (collapsed alpha particles) and range of energy “balls” sizes. The latter are immediately sorted according to the medium requirements: close to or multiple of 1838 electron masses will exist for considerable time, other will turn into thermal energy earlier. It is an enormous list of developments – you are just to register them.
    And no neutrino. As in Vladimir Vysotsky’s song: "... except fisticuffs there are no miracles!"


Hosted by uCoz