A new understanding of the Stern-Gerlach expiriment
Rudnev A.D.

   Among the variety of forms and modes of infection of physics by false knowledge, there are such techniques, which are treachery even for this physics. One of these techniques have used by people who wanted to achieve recognition of the omnipotence of quantum methods. Small-scale science target. Unacceptable fraud, even with the understanding of motives, it slowed physics, contributed to its distortion.

      Let us briefly recall the substance of experience.
     The idea of the experiments based on the fact that a particle possessing a magnetic torque in a nonuniform external magnetic field experiences a force F. The experimental difficulty lies in the fact that it is necessary to obtain the magnetic field with inhomogeneity, feasible, at distances of about the size of the atom, i.e. approximately 10-10 m. This was achieved by using magnets with specially selected magnetic enchancers. In the Stern-Gerlach experiment, whose scheme is shown in Pic. 1, a narrow beam of silver atoms evaporated by heated cathode K, passing through the diaphragm B arrive at a strongly inhomogeneous magnetic field between the poles of a magnet and then comes to a photographic plate F. On the photographic plate, laid-down atoms are arranged in two bands that are displaced from the center of the beam on the   value.
    And then starts the interpretation of results, some variants of which [1, 2] we consider
     But firstly will explain to readers the essence of photons, quantum physics and the spin torque. The meaning of quantization - a representation of the continuous physical quantity by countable number of measures. For example, time can be represented by the number of years, days or hours. That is, photons - are portions, known natural or human parameters measures. You know the joke about the fact that a broken clock 2 times a day is accurate? But in between the 12-hour intervals, it don’t give any information. So quantum computing methods undoubtedly simplify the analysis and calculations, but their applicability is limited to discrete integer argument 2π, where isn’t necessary to know the function of the parameter. Thus, quantum physics doesn’t exist, there is a physics - a classical that covers all the values of continuous parameters. Correct to speak only about simplified methods of quantum computing.
    Now about the Spin. Spin is the rotation of the object AROUND ITS OWN AXIS. Spin rotation was developed for an unstructured model of particles and then mechanically transferred even on atom. Today we know that not only the ato, but also the electron is structured, as they have the property of the dipole. Dipole properties are born in the orbital rotation of the charged bodies and particles. Spin, by definition, can’t have the torque (M = mvr) at r = 0. But back to the interpretations:
    Like all the other properties of the particles in the world of quantum physics, the magnetic spin is quantized: in an external electromagnetic field it can only take directions related to the fixed set. Otto Stern and Walther Gerlach in 1921  had performed the experiment that allowed to confirm experimentally the existence of spin in atoms, and the fact of its spatial quantization.


   Curious situation: the result of the experiment is predetermined a priori with such liberties, which in science are prohibited. Proponents of the quantum world cognition that does not imagine even the nature of the physical process in the intervals of non-integer values of argument, allow themselves to assert the quantization of spin. It's not enough, quantization, as a phenomenon of discreditation of size module, they spread already on its sign.

…If the atom is governed by the laws of classical Newtonian mechanics (ie, quantum spins would be observed), the poles of microscopic magnets would be oriented chaotically, and they would deviate in all directions. Wherever would we placed sensors behind a magnet, some atoms must be rejected in that direction and hit them. If the quantum-mechanical hypothesis is true and the spins of the atoms and the particles are quantized, they would trend only in "permitted" directions and allowed angles.

    Well, to be sure! The whole world is still puzzled how are organized atoms, and scientists of quantum physics already inserted in the atoms “poles of microscopic magnets" No more, no less - in an atom are the magnets with the poles. And most importantly, think about it, it turns out, by the laws of classical Newtonian mechanics, these magnets do not need to respond to the magnetic field!
We would emphasize "allowed angles," what are they?

… both atoms, and the elementary particles should produce magnetic fields: the first - owing to circulation of electrons in orbits; the second - owing to a spin inherent in them.

    Such simplicity, and with such significant scientific findings? -All the same, as to make up statutes from the lips of children. One would put again a dumper on the head of the author of this article, but this is true for all physics. People do not realize that the magnetic torque requires a shoulder of the magnetic force, that is absent in case of the spin rotation of any central charge. Spin, by definition, does not create magnetic forces in space. Even if the all-powerful quanta say it, do not believe. –it is verbiage.

If the projection of the atomic magnetic torque could vary continuously, then on the plate F would be observed wide diffused stripe.

    Last sentence seems right, but this also isn’t quite true. A sharp boundary of the magnetic field, that required for the appearance of the effect, gives the start for events counting. In other words, all particles (so much atoms as electrons) are oriented by the particle velocity, and the impact on them begins within a fixed point on the path of movement. Whatever the mechanism of splitting the beam of particles, it is at least partially becomes “common-mode” relative to the moment of passing the border of magnetic field. Hence, diffused stripe a priori excluded. But the mechanism of cleavage can be detected only by the methods of real physics [3].
     Electrons have a magnetic torque due to orbital rotation of energy-mass [4]. Energy-mass has spin rotation, but it does not change the magnetic torque. The atoms have a magnetic torque, since the electrons are located in the common sphere [5] with the same relative orientation, contrary to Bohr-Rutherford model.
    Pic. 2 shows the orientation of the moving charged particles (section along the line of magnets, it’s a view from the cathode).

   The secret is in the nature of energy-mass motion on its orbit: it is accelerated motion, but backward and asymmetric. That is, the energy of the electron in the orbital rotation energy-mass determined by the strength of magnetic slowdown , directed towards the motion of energy-mass.