maikelson

The existence of free electrons in points of the imaginary lattice allows to apply wave properties of electrons to the space in the whole. We have already described electrons thoroughly enough [9, 10]. Full autonomy and mutual independence in all aspects except density (concentration) is the basis for searching for characteristic features. So we have right to express energy density through the module z of space lattice of charges and electron energy

(Pa) (2)

And any pressure wave dP, affecting a lattice cell makes the cell electron adapt - to change its radius. Electron pressure

(Pa) (3)

determines the degree of deformation of electron sphere in such a way that . Or

So the orbital period changes as well as

(sec) (4)

frequency of orbital disturbances in space , that we define as energy gain .

Periodicity of such correction is equal to the orbital period. So when the time of wave energy growth is greater than Т₀ , there are a lot of such corrections.

Pic. 4. Discreteness of free electron adaptation.

Every i-step of electron adaptation is obvious to occur in the next cell along the vector of wave motion. An electromagnetic wave (both light and radio signal) spreads in such a way. So there is no need in photons for transferring wave energy. Electrons themselves are IMMOBILE. Hence Fizeau’s results follow: forced medium motion changes total wave velocity.
We don’t consider here the gamma of light phenomena determined by the structure properties. We are interested in interaction between the light wave and electron structure.

Chapter 4. Apples don’t grow in birches.

     Differences in the expected data of the famous experiment are connected with inadequacy of the term ‘aether’. They disappear if concrete facts are used, and we can trace the way of delusions.
    The supposition that change of mutual arrangement of mirrors in Michelson’s experiment would lead to differences of velocities relative to space, is GROUNDLESS. One should assume that charge cells of space cross the mirror system at the Earth orbital velocity. In fact this phenomenon in a very weakened form becomes possible only at very high altitudes. According to the formula (1) charge concentration is proportional to air density, i.e. free electrons are connected with air molecules, with the atmosphere. The atmosphere is connected with the Earth. There is no glancing of electrons relative to the Earth on its surface, so the correction is c-v=0.      Glancing of charges presupposes the appearance of areas of compaction and rarefaction in space structure. They do exist and are called Van Allen radiation belts and a layer of charge exchange is called a radiation belt. But these layers are so far that there is no sense in taking their influence into account [3], because the space drag effect is possible only at the distance not less than 20z.
     The only effect that we can expect is spontaneous deformation of the structure cells. Moreover, we use a cubic model of structure, and it can have local alterations turning into a tetrahedronical, pyramidal one, etc. The consequence of such transformations is a method accidental error of the distance between the mirrors by

0,5z (gauge shift by ). This aperture can be numerically defined as the maximum difference in results of measurements in mutually perpendicular directions for a basic length of a sunlight wave 555 nm.
The time aperture is

(5)