Itturnsungracefully:a man
useselectric
current a third
century,
thousands of bookswritten about it, and in2009we
have toforget
everything andstart
over.The
concept of"current"
manformulatedby
studyingelectricityin
conductors.And nowwe're
tryingto
"unbind" thisconcept from conductorsand, of
course,come
to a deadlocks. In the first part, we foundan
importantthing:the
vortexmagnetic field around theconductoris
determined by thedegree of
orientation ofthe
electronvelocity vector.Adegree of
orientationdepends on the ACCELERATIONof
electrons.Butthe
paradox isthat the currentisproportional
to the velocity.How can
this beconnected?The logicis
inexorable: it is possiblein a
singlecase, where theuniformly
accelerated motionof
electronsis preservedonlyover
short distancesof bpath.Thenthe
average speedwill beproportionalto the
acceleration.Figure 2shows a
graph ofthe
velocityof this motion.
Fig.2. Characteristic of
electrons velocity changing in conductors.
In order to
leave the
currentproportional
tothe velocity,
it is necessarythat the segmentsbwould be
small anduniform.The
slightestirregularityof
segmentsleads to thenonlinearityof givenenergymv ^2 / 2.Then thepotentialsin the
conductorwould beuneven,which
would
inevitably leadto localoverheatingof the
conductor.So we getanother
conditionto define
a medium asan
electrical conductor- the
uniformity ofthe
distributionof potentials.In metals,this
condition is
satisfiedautomatically due tothe strictperiodicity
of the
crystalgrid.Andin
dielectrics? Yes,condenserpapercan not
be considereduniformin
structure.But thesynthetic
filmsandoxides areuniform,at leastat the
macro level.Consequently,
theuniformity
condition is not enough.There is
anotherfactor,that
sorts
morereliably thematerialsconductivity.Let'slook at apictureof
lightning.
Fig.3.
Stochastic way of lightning strike.
Sounds familiar?Loss ofprimary direction andsearch
for the bestbranch of conductivity.-Here isan
example ofthe uneven distribution ofpotentials.And it's
additional sign-energy of the
particles fieldon the
way ofelectrons.It isthe field
of the particles energy (including atomsand
molecules) that determinesthe
resultingpotential
of the field
.Then, forthe atomiclinesof
conductionin the metalthe
patternof energy fieldswill bethe same
asshown in Figure 4.
Fig.4. Energy fields of
atoms in metals.
If summarize theeffect ofthe fields, the nature ofthe
resultant fieldwill remain, butthe lower
limitwill behigher.Lets
denote thisminimum (threshold)throughE(Fig. 5).
Fig
5.5. The
total interatomic energy field in metals.
That is whatelectrons must overcome.Here isone
subtlety:
the energyexpended inovercoming
the barrier,then
returns tothe electron,butto
overcomethe first obstacle
electrons
must obtainenergy from the outside(Fig. 6).
Fig.6. The image ofa
skateboardin overcoming the energybarrier.
Then
the returned energy will be spent on the next rise, and so on,
increasing the energy strictly by EQUAL increments dE. And
so the potential of the conductor varies in strict proportion to its
length. That is
not achievable in dielectrics. You
may ask "why?" - In fact, modern physics gives us a rule for finding
the strength in dielectrics as the ratio of the applied
tension
to the thickness of the dielectric.
But
this is one of the biggest misconceptions, as in
the absence of current, potential of the atom remains
unchanged (on the left in Figure 4). And
the intensity of falling energy field is equal to several million volts
/ meter. Increasing
the applied voltage can overcome this barrier, but then
returned huge energy would accelerate electron so
that there would come a 100% probability of collision with atoms and
molecules. Tremendous
released
energy
locally burns fragment of environment. This
is the electrical breakdown of the dielectric, when the avalanche
increase in current leads to the burning of small parts of the path. You
can easily verify that the sample with a lightning is appropriate and
the nature of dodging of breakdown currents, and the final effect are
the same. Thus,
dielectrics - a class of materials characterized by large interatomic
distances and strong atomic (molecular) fields. Atomic
field in metals by 2 orders of magnitude lower due to the strong
interatomic bonds. For
example, the energy of the free iron atom is of the order E-17 J, and
of bound atoms ~ E-19 J. The difference between these values is spent
on the mutual attraction of the atoms.